Friday, March 13, 2015

Let’s Use up the $10,000 Matching Fund Quickly




Thanks to you, 80-20 took in $10,000 in lump sum in the last 2 days.  But half  of the $10,000 in matching fund provided by  Joseph H,  and  T.-W. Wang is STILL AVAILABLE.   Let's take advantage of that quickly so that 80-20 can go and raise more matching funds to help reach the $1,000,000/yr for 5 years goal.

                            Click  HERE TO DONATE to SELF.

Click here to see the progress in SELF.

S.B. Woo, a volunteer
President, 80-20 Asian Am. National Educational Foundation, Inc.
Help us spread the word, like us  on  Facebook ,  follow us  on  Twitter   ! 

PS:    Our Best and Brightest

    So many asked me who was the generous donor who gave $240,000 to SELF.  So I begged the donor to let her name be known.  She finally agreed.  

    She is Alice S. Huang.  She was a professor of microbiology and virology at Harvard and later at California Institute of Technology.  He was a Board member of 80-20 PAC for many years, as well as that of many big corporations and foundations.  She was the President & Chairperson of AAAS,   American Association for the Advancement of Science, which is  world's largest general  scientific society.  Her spouse is Dr. David Baltimore, a Nobel Laureate in Physiology or Medicine.  Alice pilots her own airplane.  :-)

    80-20 likes to use this opportunity to salute one of our community's best and the brightest.   Together, we shall overcome.
         

80-20's Top 10 Accomplishment , published 3 years ago.  

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

The Clock is Ticking!


Good News Regarding SELF

(1)  Donation to SELF will be matched up to a lump sum of $10,000, until the 
matching fund is exhausted.  The generous matching is provided by Joseph H, 
and T.-W. Wang.

                                 Click HERE TO DONATE to SELF.

(2) The most generous donor to SELF has poured in $240,000, thereby
      paying up ALL 5-years of her commitment!   Click here and look for 
      Anonymous, Pasadena, CA  at the top of the page to verify.

(3) THANKS TO ALL DONORS, SELF's total received will soon exceed 
      $1,000,000, which is in an escrow account.  If SELF fails, all donations
      will be refunded in full.

             Good News on Seeking Justice for Officer Liang of NYPD

(a) 80-20 and Officer Liang' lawyer Steve Worth have connected.

(b) There was a demonstration of an estimated 3,000 participants on 3/8/2015 in NYC to support Officer Liang.  A demonstration is a group display of opinion. It could be used to express support for a cause, or display anger in public or both.

                      80-20 PAC Is Dying

     SELF is way behind its target to reach $1,000,000 per year for 5 years by Oct. 25, 2015.   The current commitment is only $415,900/yr for 5 yrs.  

     The old war-horses at 80-20, all volunteers, are retiring soon.  They hope to train a new generation of leaders, who owing to different times, understandably look for financial security while serving the Asian Am community.  That is why 80-20 must raise $1 million per year for 5 yrs. before the current leaders retire.  If the goal is NOT reached, 80-20 PAC will likely demise.   

    Are you willing to donate $100/yr or $1000/yr for 5 year to protect your rights and those of your children?

                                     Click HERE TO DONATE to SELF.


S.B. Woo, a volunteer
President, 80-20 Asian Am. National Educational Foundation, Inc.
www.80-20EF.org
Help us spread the word, like us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter !

        

80-20's Top 10 Accomplishment, published 3 years ago.  

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Do your share to make it IMPOSSIBLE!





                               Cause and Effect !

     80-20 was and still is the first & only Asian Am national org. to oppose the "race-preference" college admissions.  See its 5/12/2012 e-newsletter, entitled "Battles Have Begun."    

     2.5 years later, the following BiGGEST & MOST PRESTIGIOUS periodicals published articles pointing to the unfairness of "race-preference" college admissions against AsAm students.
  
(1) Nov. 9, 2014, USA  Today, "Asians Get the Ivy League's Jewish Treatment ",
(2) Nov. 9, 2014 , Wall Street Journal, "Harvard's Asian Problem",
(3) Nov. 10, 2014 NY Times, "Is Harvard Unfair to AsAm?",
(4) Dec. 26, 2014Atlantic Magazine"Do diversity indirectly discriminate against Asian Americans?"  

     Read the words used in these titles: "Jewish Treatment", "Problem,"Unfair" and "discriminate" .

                    A Widening Rank -- LA Times Joins 
                                           "How can this be possible?"

       LA Times is headquartered in LA, where 2 million AsAms make their living.  Its article on the unfairness of "race-preference" college admissions against AsAm students is most welcome.
  

    Here is AN EXCERPT from Frank Shyong's article.  To read the full article click here.

      " "Let's talk about Asians," she (an instructor for college applicants)  says. 

         Lee's next slide shows three columns of numbers from a Princeton University study that tried to measure how race and ethnicity affect admissions by using SAT scores as a benchmark. It uses the term "bonus" to describe how many extra SAT points an applicant's race is worth. She points to the first column.

         African Americans received a "bonus" of 230 points, Lee says.She points to the second column.  "Hispanics received a bonus of 185 points."  

          The last column draws gasps.  Asian Americans, Lee says, are penalized by 50 points - in other words, they had to do that much better to win admission . . . .  

          "Zenme keyi," one mother hisses in Chinese.  How can this be possible?   . . . . "      (All emphasis added by S. B. Woo)
        

                                Do Your Share!

      Ask not "
How can this be possible?",  ask if you've done your part to MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE!
                            
                                  DONATE to SELF till it hurts.

Forward this e-newsletter!

S.B. Woo, a volunteer
President, 80-20 Asian Am. National Educational Foundation, Inc.
Help us spread the word, like us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter !

        

Friday, February 27, 2015

Our Only Interest : JUSTICE for Officer Peter Liang


Indictment Against Peter Liang Politically Motivated?
Some made the above charge.  80-20 is not ready to believe it yet.  However, 80-20 must be ready to act, when called for.  In the event that politics is interfering against justice, 80-20 shall play a counter-balancing role.

 So we looked into politics in Brooklyn and the track record of District Attorney (DA) Kenneth Thompson.

                  The Demographics of Brooklyn       

The demographics, shown in the table below, project a rapidly rising political role for Asian Ams in Brooklyn elections.

Racial composition
2010
1990
19501900
 49.5% 46.9% 92.2%98.3%
-Non-Hispanic 35.8% 40.1% n/an/a
 35.8% 37.9%  7.6%1.6%
Hispanic or Latino (of any race)
 19.8% 20.1%  n/an/a
 11.3%  4.8%0.1%
0.1%

From 1990 to 2010, the population of non-Hispanic Whites, blacks and Hispanics  all decreased.  In contrast, that of Asian increased by 135%, or approximately 5% per year.  

By Spring of 2017, when the next Democratic primary for Brooklyn DA will occur, the Asian population will be about 16%.  A primary in which one constituent has an emotional grudge is where a PAC like 80-20 can play a pivotal role.

            The Track Record of DA Ken Thompson

DA Thompson was elected in 2013 after a very bitter election against a 6-term  former  Brooklyn DA Charles Hynes. Thompson was sworn in as DA on 1/1/2014.  He seems to be doing a respectable job.  Being a public servant in a city like Brooklyn is not easy.  80-20 wishes him luck.  

                                   

However, in 1.2 years, DA Thompson has generated much negative publicity.  
See some Newspaper headlines about him below:

DA's detective driver is former drug dealer | New York Post - Oct 29, 2014, and Brooklyn DA treats detectives like personal errand boys - only 4 days ago. One quote in the above article says, ""He's a psychopath," the source said. "There is no DA I know of in the state who has his own ­advance team."

    Shopping for a DA Candidate for the 2017 Election?

No, no, no!  80-20 will focus its effort on fact finding* to advance justice.  Politics should never interfere with justice.  

Let the word go forth that if 80-20 must use politics to counter-balance politically           motivated scapegoating against Officer Peter Liang of NYPD, we will!

                         Forward this e-newsletter!
     
                       
                                     DONATE to SELF till it hurts.


S.B. Woo, a volunteer
President, 80-20 Asian Am. National Political Action Committee, Inc.
Help us spread the word, like us on Facebookfollow us on Twitter !


Facts that 80-20 is very interested in verifying:
 i) Were Liang and his partner explicitly ordered not to do vertical patrolling in that building by their boss?
ii) Had Liang admitted that his finger was on the trigger?  Or, did he state that his finger was along the
    gun barrel but slipped when his right shoulder hit a door?
iii) Is there any physical evidence that the bullet hit the wall and ricocheted?  Has the physical evidence
    been protected and/or photographed?
iv) Did Liang and his partner call the Police Union first and 4 minutes later call 911?
 v) Some articles describe the stairwell as being "pitch black."  Is it true?  The jury could easily be
     convinced that Officer Liang would feel threatened in this dangerous public housing project area
     where the stairwell is pitch black. Would it then have been reasonable for him to keep the finger 
     on the trigger?
vi) What other police shooting or assault cases has the Brooklyn DA prosecuted recently?
vII) What role did Liang's partner play in this incident?  Is he under investigation or being disciplined?


        

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Position on Officer Peter Liang's arraignment


    Have you heard about the arraignment against Officer 
Peter Liang of the NYPD?   80-20 has received many emails 
from Asian Ams pleading for us to look into this matter.

    After a Board meeting, 80-2O Initiative takes the 
following positions: 

1) It shall not let Officer Peter Liang be the victim of political 
    scapegoating, if indeed we conclude this is the case, after 
    our thorough fact-finding. 

2) It advises Asian Ams. not to join or participate in petitions 
    and movements that only expose our community's political 
    ignorance/immaturity which makes us even weaker.   Take 
    the recent White House petitions as examples.  The 
    initiators and signers are great people who yearned for 
    justice.  80-20 thanks them and shares their goal.  However, 
    those petitions ignore the legal environment in the USA.  
    Keep in mind that the President of the U.S. has no legal 
    authority over an indictment in Brooklyn. Nor is Pres. 
    Obama likely to make a statement on an ongoing legal case.  
    In America, we need to practice politics the American way. 

     Remember the Jimmy Kimmel "kill every Chinese"
     episode? 80-20 got the first and ONLY written apology from 
     ABC soon after the event.  Weeks after a White House 
     petition, which asked Pres.Obama to interfere, had reached 
     100,000 signers, and long after the matter has been 
     satisfactorily resolved, there was a White House statement 
     on this matter. Did anyone remember what was said?  
     (Please note that this was not a reflection on the White 
     House, but a reflection on the silliness of that petition.  Pres. 
     Obama is not the equivalent of a Chinese Emperor.  He has 
     no authority over ABC, a private enterprise.)

     "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to 
      repeat it"   -    George Santayana.

      However, if there were a petition to 80-20 to help Office
      Liang and it quickly gathers 100,000 signatures, it would be 
      much more effective.  Why?   Because 80-20 would be 
      greatly empowered by the apparent yearning for its 
      leadership, thereby enabling it to do even more. 

3)  80-20'll strive to create a win-win situation to ensure justice
     for Officer Liang. This part of 80-20's effort requires tactical 
     maneuver in the future.  Hence, we'll only summarize the 
     essence.  The indictment of Officer Liang could be partially 
     politically motivated. Hence 80-20 will act with politics in 
     mind as well, while stressing fact finding.  Our aim is to 
     create a win-win situation for District Attorney Thompson of 
     Brooklyn, the African American community, and Officer 
     Peter Liang, while upholding justice!

4) 80-20 will be doing much fact findings and fact checkings in
    mattersshown below my name .   I encourage all to 
    volunteer your effort to help.

                 Forward this e-newsletter!
     
               Step by Step We Will Strengthen Ourselves!

     WANT SERVICE?  Pay for it, although I and many others 
have worked for YOU for free for the last 16 years
                                     DONATE to SELF till it hurts.

S.B. Woo, a volunteer
President, 80-20 Asian Am. National Educational Foundation
Help us spread the word, like us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter !




*  Facts that 80-20 is very interested in verifying:



 i) Were Liang and his partner explicitly ordered not to do 
    vertical patrolling in that building by their boss?

ii) Had Liang admitted that his finger was on the trigger?  
    Or, did he state that his finger was along the gun barrel 
    but slipped when his right shoulder hit a door?

iii) Is there any physical evidence that the bullet hit the wall 
     and ricocheted?  Has the physical evidence been protected 
       and/or photographed?

iv) Did Liang and his partner call the Police Union first and 4 minutes later
     call 911?
 v) Some articles describe the stairwell as being "pitch black."  Is it true?
     The jury could easily be convinced that Officer Liang would feel 
     threatened in this dangerous public housing project area where the 
     stairwell is pitch black. Would it then have been reasonable for him to 
     keep the finger on the trigger?
vi) What other police shooting or assault cases has the Brooklyn DA
     prosecuted recently?
vII) What role did Liang's partner play in this incident?  Is he under
      investigation or being disciplined?