Discouraged or Enraged? Hope it’s the Latter.
How the Supreme Court Has Ruled
"The
Court's affirmance of the University's admissions policy today does not necessarily mean the
University may rely on that same policy without refinement," the court wrote in its majority opinion.
Refinement? Hear the Words of
Dissenting Justices
Supreme Court Justice J. Alito, with whom
The Chief Justice and Justice Thomas joined, dissented by stating (pp 22-27):
"... But UT's plan discriminates against
Asian American students...including racial discrimination that
undeniably harms Asian Ams ... the court's willingness to allow
this "discrimination against individuals of Asian
descent is particularly troubling, in light of the long history
of discrimination against Asian
Americans, especially in education ... In particular, the
Fifth Circuit's willful blindness to Asian-American students
is absolutely shameless."
Listen! Even our Supreme Court Justices clearly described the
treatment of AsAm students as DISCRIMINATION. Why didn't the other Justices see it? My
conjecture is that they saw it too, but chose to focus on the diversity
issue and give Asian Americans the "willful blindness."
Our responsibility to our future generations is to force the
other Justices to come out of their "willful blindness."
That'll take another lawsuit.
80-20 will lead, IF you will do your share
80-20 ponders filing a very different
lawsuit. Our lawsuit will NOT get into the issue of
diversity involving Hispanic and black students. Instead,
our lawsuit will focus sharply on the various discriminations against
AsAm students, raised by the 3 Supreme Court Justices.
We'll uphold Affirmative Action but
ask "Is Affirmative Action's intent for minorities to give
advantage to the majority or the other way around?"
As Justice Alito stated, "…the court's willingness
to allow this "discrimination against
individuals of Asian descent is particularly troubling, in light of the long history of discrimination against
Asian Americans, especially in education."
80-20 will fight, if you will.
The litmus test for 80-20 to step in
There is nothing we can't achieve, if we are
united. Will we?
80-20 may start a petition site aiming to
get 1,000,000 AsAms to sign. Signers will appeal to those AsAms who
have donated to Ivy Leagues schools to STOP donating but instead
donate to build up the war chest for this lawsuit. All signers will donate
$10 or more.
Will that be enough? Yes. Here
are the names of AsAms who have given so generously to the very
universities which discriminate against AsAms, in the clear words of 3
Supreme court justices:
When they gave, did they at least ask the
universities not to discriminate against AsAms? Will they donate as
generously to help fight against the discrimination against our children,
now that the case is made so clearly by the 3 dissenting Supreme Court
Justices?
Reply to this e-newsletter. Do your share please. If we get 1,000 supportive emails within
3 days, 80-20 will take another step toward filing a lawsuit. 80-20 plans methodically,
and usually wins.
Discouraged or Enraged?
S. B. Woo
President and a
volunteer for the past 18 years
80-20 Initiative, Inc.
To know more about
80-20, view these videos :
https://youtu.be/dB3eGVqG-wA (Ignore the last 35 secs. 80-20's candidate
has won.)
