Monday, July 12, 2021

Our Best Chance to Make HARVARD Do the Right Thing

 To put this e-newsletter on WeChat, you need: https://conta.cc/3wuFTxh

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Our Best Chance to Make HARVARD Do the Right Thing

   The federal court case Students for Fair Admissions vs. President and Fellows of Harvard College (“SFFA v. Harvard”) has been making its way through the federal court system for almost 7 years now.   The case is spearheaded by SFFA and led by Ed Blum, a very successful and renowned litigant on the matter of race-based affirmative action.  It has finally reached the steps of the Supreme Court. The case was originally thought to be on track to be heard by the Supreme Court by next spring, but the court has recently asked the Biden Administration, via its Solicitor General, to file a brief, laying out its arguments.  That brief is expected to be filed sometime this fall, but it could be filed as late as early 2022, which may mean that the Supreme Court will not hear the case until mid-to-late 2022.  See SFFA v. Harvard; see also SFFA website

SFFA v. Harvard is ultimately a case about fairness.  Asian American applicants to the Ivy League have faced a de facto quota for decades, and it is about time that the Supreme Court strike down this deeply unfair practice.  Despite a dramatic increase in the number of Asian Americans as a proportion of the overall American population, and a concomitant increase in the number of Asian American applicants over the past 30-plus years, the proportion of admitted Asian American applicants at Harvard (and other Ivy League schools) had remained relatively stagnant, at a range of ~15% to ~17% of the overall admitted class, until SFFA v. Harvard was filed in 2014.  From 2014 until this year, the proportion of admitted Asian American applicants to Harvard has risen incrementally each year.  This year (2021, admitting for the Class of 2025), AsAms constituted approximately ~25% of the incoming class.  That incremental rise can probably be attributed to the immense pressure placed on Harvard by virtue of the ongoing federal court case of SFFA v. Harvard, which has been well-publicized.  

But we are NOT finished yet.  The lower courts, at the trial court and recently at the Circuit Court of Appeals, have ruled against SFFA (and for Harvard), deciding that Harvard’s de facto discrimination based on race is NOT a violation of federal law.  SFFA is hopeful that the Supreme Court will see fit to review the case, and that they will ultimately rule against Harvard.  

Harvard will NOT go quietly on this issue, and that is largely because Harvard, along with the rest of the Ivy League, has a long and deeply ingrained interest, built on centuries of momentum, to maintain the "good ol' boy" network, which, since the time of America's patrician Founding Fathers, has been overwhelmingly White Anglo-Saxon Protestant.  

It would be ineffective to simply try to "shame" the Ivy League leadership into the notion that they need to live up to a meritocratic ideal, so that they can in turn better reflect the American value of meritocracy. There is no such compulsion, within the soul of the Ivy League, because what they have been doing for centuries is to maintain the momentum of the privileged elite "blue-bloods", into each new decade. In turn, when they do this, they keep the elite satisfied, so that they continue to support their alma mater, and the cycle becomes a very mutually beneficial one, maintaining each Ivy League university's status and prestige.  

That’s why it is so important for us to all press on and support SFFA in its ongoing battle with Harvard.  Long considered the leader of the Ivy League, as its oldest university, if Harvard is legally forced to act fairly with respect to Asian American admissions, the rest of the Ivy League will have to follow.  

Let’s all do our best to support SFFA, and hope for their success.  They are doing battle on our Asian American community’s behalf, and their success in this case will lay the foundations for our children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren to have equal access to America’s most elite colleges.  Our Union will then be well on its way to becoming more perfect, as our Forefathers envisioned.


To post your view, click here DONATE.


Stephen P. Lin (writing a guest column)
Special Assistant to the President,
80-20 Educational Foundation, Inc, a 501 C-3 organization,

Friday, July 2, 2021

July 4th SPECIAL: The day I naturalized

 To put this e-newsletter on WeChat, you need: https://conta.cc/3dwt2DU

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The Day I Naturalized

    I, S. B. Woo, was born in Shanghai, China. On my own volition, I applied to become a US citizen. On the day of the naturalization ceremony in 1972, there was deep emotion - internal conflicts, probably not different from those of most others.  The enlightening words of the presiding judge, VincentBifferato* helped me understand what being a naturalized citizen was all about. I became a happy American.  Here is the essence of what he said.


"Future Fellow Citizens of the U.S.A.,
 
    You probably harbor a mixed feeling today. You may be happy because you wanted to be a U.S. citizen, and today you've achieved this goal. On the other hand, you may also be sad, because you may feel that you are saying good-bye to all that you once identify with - the people back in your old country, whose hopes and dreams you've shared. You may even be distraught, because years ago when you first came to this country, you thought you were getting an education or a career to later go back to help your people. Now you feel that you are saying good-bye to that part of your dream.

   Let me assure you that you don't need to stop caring or helping the people in your old country. If one ceremony, like the one today, can make you turn your back on the people you once cared deeply about, the U.S. doesn't want you as a citizen. The U.S. is a greater nation than that. America, a nation of immigrants, knows that people, who can turn their backs on their people instantly after one ceremony today, can turn their back on Americans after another ceremony in the future. Instant loyalty doesn't imply good citizenship. Take your time to know your new country. Examine America's core values. Experience America's sense of liberty, justice and equal opportunity. I feel certain that you will get to like America and perhaps love it. America is not perfect, and it will need your input and tender-loving care to help make it "a more perfect union" as our forefathers had hoped. ....

   Fellow citizens: Now that you are each a citizen of your new country, you owe your primary allegiance to America. However, you can continue to care and help people in your old country. Welcome. Good luck to all of you."

   After the ceremony was over, I complimented Judge Bifferato* for his extra-ordinary understanding of human nature which greatly comforted a new citizen like me. He smiled and said that most immigrants, when being naturalized, were comforted to hear they might continue to care for the people of their old country, but naturalized citizens actually "paid a tax" for it - they cannot be the president or the VP of the U.S.A. With a twinkle in his eyes, he said America's forefathers understood human nature deeply, which might be why they came up with one of the best political systems in the world.  

Naturalized Citizens Should Know

(a) Some folks change citizenship to derive advantages that come with the citizenship, without shifting their primary allegiance. If we want America to be fair with us, we must be fair with America.

(b) This is a very tough period for Chinese Americans owing to the rising tension between the U.S. and China. Stand firm. Don't give up an inch of your rights. 80-20 will fight for & with you regarding any systemic discrimination. An example is Prof. Anming Hu's case. Click (1) and (2).
   
To post your view, click here DONATE.

S. B. Woo
President and a volunteer for the past 22 years
80-20 Educational Foundation, Inc, a 501 C-3 organization,
Lieutenant Governor of Delaware (1985-89)

*Bifferato & I became good friends. I gave a keynote speech in another naturalization ceremony that he presided over. I, as the Lt. Governor of Delaware, gave a keynote whose content was similar to the above.
Gratefully acknowledging all donors including Alfred and Shirley Foung of Woodland Hill, CA who pledged another $5,000 after sending $5k earlier.